During CPAC's recent public meeting about the proposed Bulgarian MOU, I borrowed a page from Stuart Campbell, a Scottish archaeologist and government official, to suggest most people consider illicit excavations to be no worse than a traffic violation.
Of course, not all illicit excavations are equal. Here is how I would rank them from the most troubling to the least:
Illicit excavations from world heritage sites;Illicit excavations from active archaeological sites;Illicit excavations from inactive archaeological sites;Illicit excavations from archaeological sites that are obvious, but have not been excavated;Illicit excavations from mounds of excavated dirt on inactive archaeological sites;Illicit excavations from private land where there are no obvious archaeological features;Illicit excavations from private land that already has been disturbed by ploughing.And speaking of "wrongs," where would most people rank any failure of archaeologists to:
Properly record what they find;Properly publish what they find;Properly preserve what they find;Properly display what they find.
Where would archaeologists rank theses sins? Are they any worse than illicit excavations?